removed from root

This commit is contained in:
ANGX
2026-01-25 01:58:05 +01:00
parent 2dec5027f3
commit ad858eb008
2 changed files with 0 additions and 343 deletions
-199
View File
@@ -1,199 +0,0 @@
# Dependency Security Report
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-24
**npm audit:** 4 moderate vulnerabilities (dev dependencies only)
## Production Dependencies Status
**SECURE** - Zero vulnerabilities in production dependencies
```bash
npm audit --production
# 0 vulnerabilities found
```
## Development Dependencies Vulnerabilities
### Overview
All vulnerabilities are in **development-only dependencies** (testing and build tools):
| Package | Version | Severity | Path | Impact |
| --------- | ------- | -------- | ------------------------ | -------------- |
| esbuild | 0.20.0 | Moderate | Direct devDependency | Build tool |
| vite | 5.1.0 | Moderate | Transitive via esbuild | Dev server |
| vite-node | 1.2.1 | Moderate | Transitive via vite | Test runner |
| vitest | 1.2.1 | Moderate | Transitive via vite-node | Test framework |
### Impact Analysis
#### 1. **esbuild** (CVE-2024-xxxxx)
- **Severity:** Moderate
- **Type:** Build-time only
- **Impact:** Does not affect production runtime
- **Mitigation:** Isolated build environment, not exposed to users
- **Status:** Monitoring upstream for patch
#### 2. **vite** (Transitive)
- **Severity:** Moderate
- **Type:** Development server
- **Impact:** Only used during local development
- **Mitigation:** Not included in production builds
- **Status:** Will be fixed when esbuild updates
#### 3. **vite-node** (Transitive)
- **Severity:** Moderate
- **Type:** Test execution
- **Impact:** Only used during test runs
- **Mitigation:** CI runs in isolated containers
- **Status:** Will be fixed when vite updates
#### 4. **vitest** (Transitive)
- **Severity:** Moderate
- **Type:** Test framework
- **Impact:** Only used for testing
- **Mitigation:** Not in production dependencies
- **Status:** Will be fixed when vite-node updates
---
## Why This is Acceptable
### 1. **Scope: Development Only**
These packages are **never shipped to production**:
```json
{
"devDependencies": {
"esbuild": "^0.20.0",
"vite": "^5.1.0",
"vitest": "^1.2.1"
},
"dependencies": {
// Production packages here (0 vulnerabilities)
}
}
```
### 2. **Isolation: Build & Test Environments**
- **Local development:** Developer machines, not exposed
- **CI/CD:** Containerized environments (GitHub Actions)
- **Production:** Only compiled `dist/` output is deployed
### 3. **Risk Assessment: LOW**
- ⚠️ **Exploitability:** Requires access to dev environment
-**Exposure:** Not accessible to end users
-**Attack vector:** Local only (no remote exploit)
-**Data at risk:** Development code (public repository anyway)
---
## Remediation Plan
### Immediate Actions (Completed)
1. ✅ Documented all vulnerabilities
2. ✅ Verified production dependencies are clean
3. ✅ Confirmed dev-only scope
4. ✅ Risk assessment completed
### Short-term (Next 30 days)
1. ⏳ Monitor [vite releases](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases)
2. ⏳ Monitor [esbuild releases](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/releases)
3. ⏳ Update packages when patches available
### Long-term (Ongoing)
1. 🔄 Weekly `npm audit` checks (automated via Dependabot)
2. 🔄 Quarterly dependency updates
3. 🔄 Stay subscribed to security advisories
---
## Alternative Mitigations Considered
### Option 1: Update to Pre-release Versions
**Rejected** - Would introduce breaking changes and instability
### Option 2: Switch to Alternative Build Tools
**Rejected** - High migration cost for moderate dev-only risk
### Option 3: Accept Risk & Document
**CHOSEN** - Appropriate for dev-only dependencies with low exposure
---
## Verification Commands
### Check Production Dependencies
```bash
npm audit --production
# Expected: 0 vulnerabilities
```
### Check All Dependencies
```bash
npm audit
# Expected: 4 moderate vulnerabilities (dev only)
```
### View Dependency Tree
```bash
npm ls esbuild vite vitest
# Shows transitive dependency chain
```
---
## Compliance & Policy
### Security Policy Alignment
This assessment aligns with PCL Security Policy:
-**Production dependencies:** Must have 0 high/critical vulnerabilities
-**Dev dependencies:** Moderate vulnerabilities acceptable if:
- Not exposed to production
- Documented and tracked
- Remediation plan exists
### Industry Standards
-**OWASP:** A6:2017 - Security Misconfiguration (No impact for dev tools)
-**CWE-1035:** Affected packages not in production attack surface
-**NIST:** Dev environment isolation mitigates risk
---
## Sign-off
**Security Review:** ✅ APPROVED
**Reason:** Dev-only vulnerabilities with appropriate mitigations
**Reviewer:** PCL Security Team
**Date:** 2026-01-24
**Next Review:** 2026-02-24 (or when patches available)
---
## Contact
For security concerns, contact:
- **Email:** security@pcl.dev
- **GitHub:** [Security Advisories](https://github.com/personalayer/pcl-lite/security/advisories)
- **Responsible Disclosure:** See [SECURITY.md](./SECURITY.md)
-144
View File
@@ -1,144 +0,0 @@
# Security Audit Report
**Date:** 2026-01-24
**Branch:** feature/adaptive-intelligence-q2-2025
**PR:** #23
## Summary
This document addresses the security findings from GitHub Advanced Security scanning.
## 1. Secret Scanning Findings
### Environment Variable References (FALSE POSITIVES)
The following findings are **not actual secrets** but legitimate environment variable references:
#### File: `examples/rest-api-wrapper.ts`
```typescript
apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY!,
```
**Status:** ✅ SAFE - Environment variable reference
**Explanation:** No hardcoded secret. Reads from environment at runtime.
#### File: `examples/runtime-providers.ts`
```typescript
apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY || 'test-key',
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY || 'test-key',
```
**Status:** ✅ SAFE - Environment variable references with fallback
**Explanation:** Fallback 'test-key' is intentional for local testing (non-functional).
### Recommended Actions
1. Add `.github/secret_scanning.yml` to whitelist these patterns
2. Mark as false positives in GitHub Security tab
3. No code changes required
---
## 2. Dependency Review - Moderate Vulnerabilities
### Dev Dependencies Only
All vulnerabilities are in **development dependencies** and do **not affect production**:
| Package | Severity | Transitive Chain | Impact |
| --------- | -------- | --------------------- | --------- |
| esbuild | Moderate | Direct dev dependency | Dev only |
| vite | Moderate | Depends on esbuild | Dev only |
| vite-node | Moderate | Depends on vite | Dev only |
| vitest | Moderate | Depends on vite-node | Test only |
### Why This is Acceptable
1. **Not in production**: These packages are in `devDependencies` only
2. **Build/Test tools**: Only used during development and CI
3. **No runtime risk**: Not included in final dist/build output
4. **Managed by maintainers**: Waiting for upstream fixes from vite/vitest teams
### Mitigation
- Production dependencies: **0 vulnerabilities**
- Runtime code: **Not affected**
- CI/CD: Runs in isolated containers ✅
### Future Actions
- Monitor upstream fixes from vite maintainers
- Update when patch is available
- No immediate action required
---
## 3. API Compatibility Check
### Expected Failure (New Feature Branch)
**Status:** ⚠️ EXPECTED FAILURE
**Reason:** This PR introduces new files in `src/build/` that don't exist in `develop` branch:
- `src/build/dependency-resolver.ts`
- `src/build/module-loader.ts`
- `src/build/build-system.ts`
**Resolution:** Merge `develop` to `main` first, or mark as expected for feature branches.
---
## 4. CodeQL Analysis
**Status:** ✅ 11 NEW ALERTS ADDRESSED
All critical security issues have been fixed:
### Fixed Issues (Commit 5880ea4)
1.**Insecure randomness** → Replaced `Math.random()` with `crypto.randomBytes()`
2.**Permissive CORS** → Restricted to `ALLOWED_ORIGINS` whitelist
3.**Disabled CSP** → Enabled Content-Security-Policy with directives
4.**Log injection** → Sanitized user input before logging
### Remaining Alerts (Code Quality)
- Unused variables/imports (12+ files) → Cleaned up
- `any` type usage → Documented as necessary for dynamic registry backends
- Test file warnings → Acceptable (development code)
---
## Conclusion
### Production Security Status: ✅ SECURE
- **Runtime vulnerabilities:** 0
- **Critical issues:** All fixed
- **Secret exposure:** No actual secrets found
### CI Check Status
| Check | Status | Action Required |
| ----------------- | ---------- | ---------------------------- |
| Build & Lint | ✅ PASSING | None |
| Tests | 🔄 PENDING | Await completion |
| CodeQL | ✅ PASSING | 11 alerts resolved |
| Secret Scanning | ⚠️ FAILING | Mark false positives |
| Dependency Review | ⚠️ FAILING | Document dev-only impact |
| API Compatibility | ⚠️ FAILING | Expected (new feature files) |
### Recommended Next Steps
1. **Immediate:** Mark Secret Scanning findings as false positives in GitHub UI
2. **Short-term:** Add `.github/secret_scanning.yml` whitelist file
3. **Medium-term:** Monitor for vite/vitest security updates
4. **Pre-merge:** Ensure all tests pass (currently pending)
---
**Report Generated:** 2026-01-24 11:56:35
**Auditor:** PCL Security Team