From 86177c14e8e4ba0971103a4a1d259dc249a07683 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: worktrunk-bot <254187624+worktrunk-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:13:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] skills(running-tend): name the bundled gate this section overrides Gate 3 in the bundled review-gates reference classes a never-restoring cache as wasted compute and names "a cache" among the mechanisms that fail it at any occurrence count, so the delete-and-comment call this section corrects is what that gate prescribes. Framing the section as a reading of the gate left the two disagreeing; framing it as a repo override resolves it under the documented repo-over-bundled precedence. --- .claude/skills/running-tend/SKILL.md | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/.claude/skills/running-tend/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/running-tend/SKILL.md index 00c6c26d5..351ca7cd0 100644 --- a/.claude/skills/running-tend/SKILL.md +++ b/.claude/skills/running-tend/SKILL.md @@ -118,10 +118,11 @@ restores, a step whose output nothing reads, a check that can't fail — should open the PR that makes it work. Deleting the broken thing and leaving a comment explaining what a working version would take is the wrong shape: it banks the analysis in a code comment and leaves the improvement unclaimed, -and a maintainer reading it asks for the fix anyway (#3846). The -review-runs cost gate is about not spending a maintainer's review on churn, -not about preferring the smaller diff — a fix that is three coupled edits -with a real payoff clears it. +and a maintainer reading it asks for the fix anyway (#3846). This overrides +**Gate 3** in the bundled review-gates reference for this repo: that gate +classes a never-restoring cache as wasted compute and names "a cache" among +the mechanisms that fail it at any occurrence count. Here, machinery a sweep +has diagnosed gets the fix rather than the deletion the gate would allow. Fix it when the mechanism is understood well enough to predict the working version's behavior offline (recompute the key, replay the hash, diff the