Files
Edward Cheng-I Wu f832c89f60 docs: Gartenberg et al. (2026) fourth human-in-the-loop anchor, volume non-goal, cognitive-surrender note (#833) (#841)
- README.md / README.zh-TW.md motivation: fourth anchor paragraph for the
  Organization Science AI Task Force editorial "More versus better"
  (37(3):795-812). Scope stated: one journal, observational, aggregate,
  proprietary classifier. Cited as design rationale, not as evidence about
  ARS output.
- POSITIONING.md "Rejected mechanisms": volume as an outcome. No batch
  manuscript generation, no fan-out of one run into several submissions,
  time-to-draft booked as a resource cost.
- shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md 1.0 -> 1.0.1: related-construct
  citation on Cognitive Vigilance (uncritical acceptance of AI output;
  "cognitive surrender" as the editorial cites Shaw & Nave 2026). Scoring,
  dimensions, and the descriptive-only reporting rule unchanged; a low
  score stays an observation, not a failure.
- CHANGELOG [Unreleased] > Changed.

The claim_strength_ladder.md item from #833 is byte-pinned by the
revision-claim-drift suite (CLAIM_LADDER_SHA256 and the frozen v2
adjudication rubric); it is held for a separate decision.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AYAjWg2eBEz3UV7MZn7eFt

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-08 15:50:58 +09:00
..