mirror of
https://github.com/callstack/agent-device.git
synced 2026-09-14 20:06:34 +08:00
Michał Pierzchała
8f98d23f14
* refactor(layering): give each colliding rule id its own number
R11 and R13 each named two unrelated rules. report() groups violations by the
rule string and titles every annotation `Layering drift (${rule})`, so a shared
number made the guard's output ambiguous about which rule fired.
Reference counts decided which rule keeps its number. R11 package-boundaries is
named in ~30 places (CONTEXT.md, ADR 0019, testing.md, the mutation and
affected-check configs, four package source comments, its own tests) against one
for the contracts rule; R13 platform-package-substrate is the RULE in three
policy files plus CONTEXT.md, ADR 0019 and model.ts against two for the devices
cutover. Both keepers stay put and the two newest rules move up:
R11 contracts-implementation-authority -> R18
R13 device-inventory-cutover -> R17
R17/R18 follow the namespace's order-of-addition convention (R14 #1701 < R15
#1702 < R16 #1724): device-inventory-cutover landed in #1699 and
contracts-implementation-authority in #1701. #1656 took R19 for
selector-pipeline-ownership on the same reading.
The rule-map header in check.ts is renumbered and reordered back into numeric
order, and gains the R18 entry the contracts rule never had -- without it a
reader looking up an R18 violation finds nothing where they used to find the
wrong rule. deviceInventoryCutoverSummary() was also the only OK-line summary
not leading with its rule number, which is what made the number unreadable from
the success line in the first place.
Also corrects a normative ADR reference. ADR 0019's platform-package import
rules -- contracts-to-platform, sibling-platform, root/daemon, raw-process --
are R13's, as CONTEXT.md:420 already says. The R11 attribution predates
platform-package-policy (#1697, a day before #1699), when R11 was the only
package rule.
* chore(layering): retire the expired R11/R13 collision allowances
KNOWN_RULE_ID_COLLISIONS was opened for exactly the two collisions the previous
commit renames apart, and ruleIdCollisionFailures expires an allowance on
contact: once the collision is gone the entry fails as stale, because a list
still naming it would wave it back through if anyone reintroduced it.
Both entries are therefore deleted in the change that removes the collisions,
leaving the empty list that admits nothing. The namespace is now one-to-one
across R2-R19.